Long HR surveys kill a team's momentum. Trivo tracks Morale, Quality and Flow in seconds, while our AI turns raw team feedback into concrete next steps before your team's next sync.
You don't need to integrate a massive HR system to get started. Just sign up, and you can create your first pulse and start measuring within minutes.
Raw check-in feedback
"CI/CD was slow all sprint."
"Felt stressed about the API rate limits."
"Staging crashed twice before the demo."
Next steps for your sync
Review CI/CD pipeline latency with the platform team.
Clarify API rate-limit requirements before the next sprint.
Add a staging smoke-test to the pre-demo checklist.
Ask the assistant
Every score and every comment from your check-ins is sitting there. The assistant just reads it back to you in a sentence. Ask why flow dropped, what people keep raising, or what to do about it, and get an answer grounded in the actual numbers.
It never invents a figure, and it never names anyone. The written feedback stays anonymous. Just morale, quality and flow on a 1–9 scale, and the themes running through what the team wrote.
Assistant
Platform team
How it works
The team leader gives a start date and end date. Everyone on the team gets an email the moment it opens.
Three sliders for morale, quality and flow, and three open questions. A couple of minutes each, once per check-in. No name is ever shown next to an answer.
Morale, quality and flow plotted across 30 or 90 days, so a bad week reads as a bad week and a slide reads as a slide.
An executive summary, the themes running through the comments, and next steps small enough to finish inside one cycle. Why this works →
It's a web app, not a meeting. Nobody has to be in the office or in the room to take part.
Everyone gets a link by email and answers from wherever they work, if it is at home, the office, a different timezone. Distributed and hybrid teams take part exactly the same way, on their own time, in a couple of minutes.
Open the check-in a few days ahead of your sync. By the time the team sits down, the scores, the split flags and the comments are already in so the meeting is spent discussing the period, not gathering reactions on the spot.
Every check-in rates the same three dimensions on a 1–9 scale. Same questions every time, which is what makes the trend mean something.
"How did you feel overall this period?"
"How satisfied were you with your output?"
"How consistent was your focus?"
1–3 critical · 4–6 moderate · 7–9 healthy
Anonymous feedback
A score tells you something changed. The writing tells you why. Every check-in asks three open questions, and no name is ever shown beside an answer.
Written feedback goes to the team leader and nobody else. Company administrators see the report, never the raw comments.
We ask people to avoid personal identifiers, and we say so in the app. On a very small team, be realistic with your people about what stays unguessable.
What went well?
"Pairing on the migration saved us days. Best week in a while."
What could be improved?
"Three days of the sprint went to unplanned support work. Again."
Action items & next steps
"Rotate a support duty so the rest of us keep a clear runway."
Alignment
One number per dimension smooths everything over. A flow score of 4.8 might mean the whole team landed near five or half of them scored a 2 while the other half scored an 8. The average reads the same either way.
Trivo looks at how far apart the answers sit, not just the middle. When a dimension is split, it flags the disagreement automatically so you walk into the sync knowing where the team doesn't see things the same way.
Flow
4.8
Team average
4.8
Member range
2–8
On average the period looked fine but individual scores ran from 2 to 8. That hidden disagreement is the signal worth bringing into the sync.
Two views. One shows you the shape of the last three months, the other tells you what to do on Monday.
The trend view
Morale
6.4
AlignedQuality
7.1
MixedFlow
4.8
SplitThe alignment check is the interesting one. A 4.8 could be a whole team that's mildly unhappy, or half the team fine and half checked out. When individual scores on a dimension are far apart, Trivo flags it as Split, that's usually where the real conversation is.
Underneath the charts, the leader gets every comment from the period with its scores and date attached buth with no name.
What people wrote
"Three days went to unplanned support work again. Pairing on the migration was the one bright spot."
"Priorities shifted mid-sprint twice. Hard to plan around that."
For your next sync
The insight report
Every score and every comment from the period goes into one report: an executive summary, the themes running through the writing, a read on each dimension and where it's heading, and concrete next steps.
It rewrites itself as responses come in, so it's current whenever you open it. Print it and take it into your next sync.
Included on Pro and Business.
Insight Report
Executive summary
Quality is holding, but flow has dropped for a third period running as unplanned support work keeps displacing committed sprint scope.
Key themes
Metric breakdown
Suggested next steps
Trust survives on being specific about this, so here it is.
Stop guessing what your team needs.
Get the data, then have the conversation.
The Acceleration Era
AI and automation are speeding up every function. Engineering ships faster, sales works more leads, support closes more tickets. None of that measures the human cost, burnout, misalignment, and quality quietly slipping. Built for engineering first, Trivo works for any team that runs on a cadence — keeping that visible whether the work is a sprint, a pipeline, or a queue. So faster doesn't mean fragile.
Not ready yet? Get product updates and new features in your inbox.